art, academic and non-fiction books
publishers’ Eastern and Central European representation

Name your list

Log in / Sign in

ta strona jest nieczynna, ale zapraszamy serdecznie na stronę www.obibook.com /// this website is closed but we cordially invite you to visit www.obibook.com

ISBN: PB: 9780300205770

ISBN: HB: 9780300171112

Yale University Press

August 2014

384 pp.

23.4x15.6 cm

19 black&white illus.

PB:
£24,00
QTY:
HB:
£53,00
QTY:

Categories:

Mere Machine

The Supreme Court, Congress, and American Democracy

Introductory textbooks on American government tell us that the Supreme Court is independent from the elected branches, and that independent courts better protect rights than their more deferential counterparts. But are these facts, or myths? In this groundbreaking new work, Anna Harvey reports evidence showing that the Supreme Court is in fact extraordinarily deferential to congressional preferences in its constitutional rulings. Analyzing cross-national evidence, Harvey also finds that the rights protections enjoyed in the United States appear to be largely due to the fact that they do not have an independent Supreme Court. In fact, they would likely have even greater protections for political and economic rights, were they to prohibit federal courts from exercising judicial review altogether. Harvey's findings suggest that constitutional designers would be wise to heed Thomas Jefferson's advice to "Let mercy be the character of the law-giver, but let the judge be a mere machine".

About the Author

Anna Harvey is associate professor of political science at New York University. She lives in New York City.

Reviews

"There is no scholar whose work on judicial independence is more provocative or demands greater attention than Anna Harvey. Professor Harvey's empirical finding that the U.S. Supreme Court is responsive to the preferences of the House of Representatives poses a profound challenge to the conventional wisdom about both judicial independence and the Supreme Court. This conclusion is documented at length with painstaking methodological rigor and transparency. In particular, her strategy of drawing inferences from what she terms the 'missing docket', or the cases that the Court declines to hear, is instructive and groundbreaking. This book ought to be a must-read for constitutional scholars, law and courts scholars, judicial politics scholars, and public law scholars alike" – David Law, Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis