Americans tend to believe in government that is transparent and accountable. Those who govern us work for us, and therefore they must also answer to us. But how do we reconcile calls for greater accountability with the competing need for secrecy, especially in matters of national security? Those two imperatives are usually taken to be antithetical, but Heidi Kitrosser argues convincingly that this is not the case – and that our concern ought to lie not with secrecy, but with the sort of unchecked secrecy that can result from "presidentialism", or constitutional arguments for broad executive control of information.
In "Reclaiming Accountability", Kitrosser traces presidentialism from its start as part of a decades-old legal movement through its appearance during the Bush and Obama administrations, demonstrating its effects on secrecy throughout. Taking readers through the key presidentialist arguments – including "supremacy" and "unitary executive theory" – she explains how these arguments misread the Constitution in a way that is profoundly at odds with democratic principles. Kitrosser's own reading offers a powerful corrective, showing how the Constitution provides myriad tools, including the power of Congress and the courts to enforce checks on presidential power, through which we could reclaim government accountability.
About the Author
Heidi Kitrosser is professor of law at the University of Minnesota.
Reviews
Mary-Rose Papandrea, Boston College
"Reclaiming Accountability offers an extremely powerful and persuasive response to the dominant scholarly narratives today regarding executive power. This topic could hardly be timelier or more important".
David Cole, Georgetown University Law Center
"Secrecy breeds power, and power demands secrecy. Kitrosser shows how this dynamic has changed the American presidency and threatened our democracy. She provides a nuanced and compelling diagnosis of the problem secrecy creates and concrete proposals for how to get accountability back".
Robert G. Vaughn, American University, Washington College of Law
"In Reclaiming Accountability, Kitrosser examines how theories of presidential supremacy and of a unitary executive have undermined accountability by encouraging unchecked secrecy. Her analysis deftly applies constitutional history and theory to many contemporary assertions of presidential power. Every chapter rewards the reader by providing detailed information, nuanced arguments and telling insights. Kitrosser speaks to researchers, legislators, transparency advocates, and to anyone troubled by the risks to democratic governance posed by limited executive accountability. She gives us much to consider and much to do".
Louis Fisher, the Constitution Project, author of The Law of the Executive Branch
"Over the years, Kitrosser has provided sound and insightful analysis about the damage done to government by executive branch secrecy and inflated presidential power. In Reclaiming Accountability, she directs her research to the steps needed to restore constitutional government, the system of checks and balances, and the Framers' faith in self-government that is rooted in voters sending their representatives to Congress. An important and thoughtful book".
Peter. L. Strauss, Columbia Law School
"Those of us concerned with the steady and apparently irresistible growth of presidential administration will find in Kitrosser's brilliant book a thoughtful response, thoroughly grounded in original understandings, to the overstatements of the constitutional arguments claimed to support it, and a careful exposition of counter-arguments that could help to curb it. Rich with detail and examples, she shows how the arguments for presidential accountability, well grounded in our Constitution, support neither presidential supremacy nor the stronger forms of argument for a unitary executive, but rather one in which executive secrecy and command are contained by law. The laws whose faithful execution the President is obliged to assure assign duties to others than himself, and unless he is the absolute monarch the authors of our Constitution clearly rejected, those assignments must be a part of the law whose faithful execution he is responsible for. Kitrosser's welcome analysis suggests how this might be accomplished".
