Arbitrary Rule
Slavery, Tyranny, and the Power of Life and Death
Slavery appears as a figurative construct in countless cultural and historical contexts, especially during the English revolution of the mid-seventeenth century, and again in the American and French revolutions, when radical pamphleteers and theorists repeatedly represented their treatment as a form of political slavery. What, if anything, does this figurative, political slavery have to do with transatlantic slavery? In "Arbitrary Rule", Mary Nyquist explores connections between political and chattel slavery by excavating the tradition of Western political thought that justifies actively opposing tyranny. Political slavery, whether civil or national, Nyquist shows, is frequently paired with its antagonist, political tyranny".Arbitrary Rule" is the first book to tackle political slavery's discursive complexity, engaging Eurocolonialism, political philosophy, and literary studies, areas of study too often kept apart. Nyquist proceeds through analyses not only of texts that are canonical in political thought – by Aristotle, Cicero, Hobbes, and Locke – but also of literary works by Buchanan, Montaigne, and Milton, together with a variety of colonialist and political writings. She argues that "antityranny discourse" – originating in democratic Athens, adopted by republican Rome, and revived in early modern Western Europe – provided members of a "free" community with a means of protesting a threatened reduction of privileges, or of consolidating a collective, political identity. Its semantic complexity, however, also enabled it to legitimize racialized enslavement and imperial expansion. Throughout, Nyquist demonstrates how principles relating to political slavery and tyranny are bound up with a Roman jurisprudential doctrine that sanctions the power of life and death held by the slaveholder over slaves and, by extension, the state over its citizenry.
About the Author
Mary Nyquist is professor of English and comparative literature at the University of Toronto.
Reviews
"Mary Nyquist has achieved a famous first: a mature, dispassionate examination of the discourse of 'antityrannicism' as exemplified in writings of both a theoretical and a literary nature ranging from Aristotle through Cicero, Buchanan, and Montaigne, to Milton, Hobbes, and Locke. Through her highly intelligent readings of authors with their own very different, indeed sometimes radically opposed, agendas, she shows brilliantly how the antityrannicism discourse could be deployed to sharpen the audience's perception of the threat posed by tyranny to the privileges and dignity of a free community. As she rightly emphasizes, the interpretative challenges posed by 'slavery' used as a figure for distinctively political oppression have rarely been critically faced – she not only faces up to them but faces them down" – Paul Cartledge, University of Cambridge
"'Arbitrary Rule' is a remarkable book. It displays an impressive command of early modern literature and political thought, and throughout operates at a very high level of engagement and originality. It abounds in new perceptions and genuinely transforms the landscape of the period. I have no doubt that it will become a central focus of discussion for many years to come" – David Norbrook, University of Oxford
"This daring interdisciplinary study effectively blends literary interpretation with historical and philosophical analysis. Through laying bare the nuances of antityrannical ideology, both ancient and modern, 'Arbitrary Rule' arrestingly reveals the interconnections between liberalism, transatlantic slavery, and discourses on political servitude. Mary Nyquist's imagination and sparkling intelligence shine through on every page" – Ryan K. Balot, author of "Greek Political Thought"
"Mary Nyquist's elegant study, 'Arbitrary Rule', joins distinguished works by Page duBois, Orlando Patterson, and Susan Buck-Morss in situating the roots of political philosophical freedom in tyranny and slavery. Her precise readings of Aristotle, Cicero, Hobbes, and Locke, elaborate ancient, early modern, and Enlightenment defenses of slavery that have too long remained unrecognized" – Lisa Lowe, Tufts University
