Limits of History
History casts a spell on our minds more powerful than science or religion. It does not root us in the past at all. It rather flatters us with the belief in our ability to recreate the world in our image. It is a form of self-assertion that brooks no opposition or dissent and shelters us from the experience of time.
So argues Constantin Fasolt in "The Limits of History", an ambitious and pathbreaking study that conquers history's power by carrying the fight into the center of its domain. Fasolt considers the work of Hermann Conring (1606-81) and Bartolus of Sassoferrato (1313/14-57), two antipodes in early modern battles over the principles of European thought and action that ended with the triumph of historical consciousness. Proceeding according to the rules of normal historical analysis – gathering evidence, putting it in context, and analyzing its meaning – Fasolt uncovers limits that no kind of history can cross. He concludes that history is a ritual designed to maintain the modern faith in the autonomy of states and individuals. God wants it, the old crusaders would have said. The truth, Fasolt insists, only begins where that illusion ends.
With its probing look at the ideological underpinnings of historical practice, "The Limits of History" demonstrates that history presupposes highly political assumptions about free will, responsibility, and the relationship between the past and the present. A work of both intellectual history and historiography, it will prove invaluable to students of historical method, philosophy, political theory, and early modern European culture.
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1. A Dangerous Form of Knowledge
2. The Subject: Hermann Conring
3. The Context: Discursus Novus
4. The Text: Bartolus of Sassoferrato
5. The Limits of History
Notes
Works Cited
Index
About the Author
Constantin Fasolt is a professor of history at the University of Chicago. He is the author of "Council and Hierarchy: The Political Thought of William Durant the Younger" and the editor and translator of "Hermann Conring's New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor".
Reviews
"Fasolt argues that all historical study inevitable is limited and distorted, in that it rests on historians' mostly unexamined political values and beliefs about time, eternity, truth, meaning, freedom, and responsibility. By showing how our political beliefs determine how we understand the past and the present and how we use this understanding to make our choices about the future, Fasolt argues that 'the study of history is in and of itself a form of political activity' and 'a dangerous form of knowledge'... He illustrates his argument through an intriguing exploration of the writings of a significant early modern German political theorist and polymath, Hermann Conring (1606-81), especially Conring's interpretation of the Roman law doctrines of Bartolus of Sassoferrato (1313/14-1357). This erudite, challenging, and highly readable exploration of the limits of historical study opens many controversial and rewarding vistas for historians and philosophers of history alike" – Choice
"In 'The Limits of History', Constantin Fasolt engages in traditional history in order to illustrate its limitations. The main subject of his book is Hermann Conring (1606-1681), a German historian who is best known for his argument against both the universality of Roman law and the notion that the Holy Roman Emperor held authority to rule the world... History is more than just a form of knowledge. According to Fasolt, it is designed to uphold the modern belief that humans are free and independent agents and their actions determine the course of the past... Thus, history is a form of self-assertion and is tantamount to taking sides by insisting on a certain order and eliminating rival orders" – Amy R. Sims, History Teacher
"For Constantine Fasolt, the limits of history can be found not by a customary analysis of historical methodology but only by the study of history's foundational event, the historical revolution in the period between the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. That revolution was the key force in replacing the world of the Middle Ages dominated by custom, tradition, and universalism with one marked by liberty and its manifestations: the self-assertion, autonomy, and sovereignty of individuals and states... Put simplistically, the medieval and modern worlds are separated by a categorical gap" – Ernst Breisach, American Historical Review
